Worldviews Part One:
Why Worldview Matters

Aerial view of a rocky landscape featuring small green and dark ponds, surrounded by vegetation and rugged terrain.

Postmodernism

Everyone has a worldview.

If you didn’t, every new piece of information would have to be processed as unconnected to all other information you had encountered previously. Merriam-Webster defines ‘worldview’ as “a comprehensive conception or apprehension of the world especially from a specific standpoint” (Merriam-Webster online, 2022). Worldviews can change, if challenged with new information that leads to reconsideration of a current belief system. The concept of worldviews may seem esoteric or academic, but it is profoundly impactful on our everyday lives. Many issues that impact our society and the brotherhood are controversial because of the variety of worldviews among us. 

In this series of articles, I hope to explore complex issues related to worldviews. The goals are threefold. First, to provide a framework for looking at worldviews that have impacted the development of society. Secondly, to encourage an understanding of how differing worldviews within the brotherhood will impact our perspectives and our interactions with others on issues that are becoming increasingly more relevant to us all, such as homosexuality, transgenderism, abortion, medically assisted suicide, and much more. Finally, to look at some of these issues in depth and reason through them scripturally. It may be tempting to leave these topics in the realm of the political, but I hope to demonstrate how impactful they are on our ecclesias and how necessary it is that we be able to speak about them with wisdom, informed by both truth and love. If you have not encountered differences in belief on these matters in your ecclesia or the wider Christadelphian body, it is likely you soon will. More importantly, you already undoubtedly know people struggling with these issues, even if you are unaware. We can offer hope and help to those struggling, but only if we come from a place of love, compassion, and truth, which are hallmarks of a biblical worldview. This is the spirit the current series will prayerfully and humbly attempt to present.

Framework for Discussing Worldviews

When reading about worldviews, a reader will quickly discover there is no consensus on how many worldviews exist and there is not a clear delineation between them. For instance, one source lists six major worldviews: theism, pantheism, polytheism, naturalism, humanism, and postmodernism (Six Primary Worldviews, 2018). Within each of those six categories, they put specific ideologies such as Marxism, Hinduism, Christianity, existentialism, and more. Barna Research Group lists many of those latter ideologies as separate worldviews (Barna Group, 2018).

Having an exact list of all potential worldviews is not as important as being aware of the influences of any ideology on our beliefs. When considering any “ism,” it’s helpful to consider the way it looks at a few key issues. Among those issues are the origins of life, purpose and/or nature of humans, how truth/reality is known (or whether it can be), and what values are important/how those values are formed. One can find many sources for matrices that compare and contrast various worldviews in these areas.

The following chart is one example: https://cristinao.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/sire-cristinao.pdf (Sire, 2009).

This article will take a macro view of these issues, and interested readers are encouraged to take a deeper dive as a follow-up. We will examine three time periods, which could be referred to as philosophical epochs: premodernism, modernism, and postmodernism. These epochs - and especially postmodernism - are frequently referred to as worldviews themselves, but they also serve as a useful framework for discussing the topic as a whole, and the previously mentioned worldviews can be situated within them.

Premodernism

The premodern time period is typically thought of as the period from the Dark Ages until the 1500-1700’s (Gale Encyclopedia of World History: Governments, n.d.). During this time, God was understood by most to not only exist, but to be intimately involved in all that happened. God was the author of absolute truth and - for most - the answer to every question. In the premodern era, theism was the predominant worldview.

Modernism

Technological and societal changes came about during the time of the Renaissance, the Protestant Reformation, and the Age of Enlightenment (Wikipedia, 2022). With these changes came a transition to the modern era, generally described as dating from the end of premodern times to the 1960’s. This transition is sometimes referred to as a change from mythos to logos: from a focus on the supernatural or spiritual to a focus on logic and rationality (Fraser, 2018). Religion was still a driving force in the lives of most, but there was a growing emphasis on individuals reading and interpreting for themselves. The scientific method came about as a way of deciphering truth, and many rejected the Bible because it didn’t seem to be provable by that method. Some attempted to explain miracles described in the Bible as having taken place due to purely natural means. The Industrial Revolution occurred during this era, along with many important scientific discoveries. Deism began to gain popularity during this time. Other worldviews during this era include naturalism, materialism, and existentialism. It should be noted that these worldviews are still in existence but had their origins in the modern era.

Postmodernism came about as a response to modernism, just as modernism was a reaction to premodernism. Its genesis is usually estimated to be in the 1960’s (Duignan. 2022). Postmodernists noticed that the reason and objectivity that were hallmarks of the modernist movement were flawed. Humans cannot be entirely objective, and our reason has limits. Scientific processes will continually uncover new ‘truths,’ making past ‘truths’ obsolete. After noticing these flaws in past ways of thinking, there was a movement toward a denial of absolute truth altogether. Postmodernism, which can be considered an era as well as the predominant worldview that is active today in North America (and many other places), embraces relativism

and rejects universal truth. People create or ‘construct’ knowledge, rather than it being revealed by God or reason, and there is a heavy emphasis on narrative, story, and living one’s ‘own truth.’ Morality and ethics are understood to be situational, and what is considered good in a society is determined by what is determined by that society to be so. Under the umbrella of postmodernists, one could put nihilism and, by some sources, New Age thinking. 

Within these eras, one could discuss dozens of worldviews and situate each within the context of one or more of the eras covered. Follow-up reading would be a worthwhile endeavor for anyone interested in the subject. But this overview gives an idea of how worldviews in each era fit into the overall progression from premodern to postmodern. It should also be noted that although there has been an overall progression from premodern to postmodern, there have always been those with a variety of worldviews in each era.

Postmodernism and its Connection to Progressive Christianity 

Any article-length summary of the history and evolution of worldviews will not be comprehensive, nor will everyone reading said summary agree on every point. What is vital to understand is that a predominant worldview at any given time is always a reaction of some sort to those that came before; and is often the result of a pendulum that has swung too far. We all want to believe that we are independent thinkers, but we are products of the societies in which we live. 

Modernists recognized that human reason was an important tool that could be applied to solve problems and create advancements in many areas. Their flaw was in believing that human reason and logic could solve every problem. Likewise, early postmodernists noticed a flaw in the reasoning of modernists. They saw that humans cannot solve every problem, and that trying to uncover universal truths through reason and the scientific method is no more comprehensive a solution than those posed by modernists before them. But, rather than recognizing that humans will be imperfect in their application of the truth revealed by God, and will not always live up to the ideals of their calling, postmodernist thinking largely rejects that there is any absolute truth; or - at the very least - reject that an absolute truth can be known by humans. 

This way of thinking has had an enormous impact on Christianity in the last few decades. Christians have historically recognized God as the source of absolute truth, and Jesus as the only path to salvation. But in a postmodern world, any belief in absolute truth will face pushback. This pressure has led to the development of what is known as progressive Christianity, an attempt to mesh the tenets of postmodernism with those of Christianity. I hope to show throughout this series that this is a logical impossibility, and that progressive Christian positions are well-motivated but ultimately problematic when compared to scripture. Postmodernism rejects absolutes (which is itself a contradiction; how does one assert that a position espousing non-absolutes is absolutely true?). Christianity is founded on the belief in one God who reveals absolute truth, Who, in fact, manifested that truth in His son, who declared himself to be “the truth” (John 14:6). Recognizing Jesus as just ‘one truth’ is logically incoherent. If Jesus is who

he declares himself to be, then all other religions without Jesus as that ‘one truth’ are by necessity not true. 

With any attempt at categorizing a belief system, there will be difficulties and disagreements. It is always best to ask anyone who ascribes to a specific label for themselves, “What are you intending by that label? It’s equally important not to use terms that mean different things to different people without defining terms. For this reason, I will quote directly from a website outlining progressive Christianity from the viewpoint of those who hold it. We shouldn’t assume that anyone who self-describes their view as ‘progressive’ will necessarily endorse every view found on this website. Additionally, one of the ironies of the postmodern world we live in is that disagreement with a viewpoint will necessarily be seen by some as an attack. This makes sense from a postmodern view, because there is no recognition of absolute truth. Therefore disagreeing with a particular viewpoint is seen as denying the validity of someone else’s ‘lived experience.’ This is somewhat unavoidable but is helpful to acknowledge. The intent of these articles is to encourage comparing every viewpoint - regardless of label - with scripture.

Aerial view of a green marshland with a winding stream

Progressive Christianity

The website www.progressivechristianity.org has provided several versions of its ‘core values’ throughout the years. The most recent version, updated in 2022, contains five points, which are quoted directly from their site. Progressive Christians are Christians who: 

  1. Believe that following the way and teachings of Jesus can lead to experiencing sacredness, wholeness, and unity of all life, even as we recognize that the Spirit moves in beneficial ways in many faith traditions. 

  2. Seek a community that is inclusive of all people, honoring differences in theological perspective, age, race, sexual orientation, gender identity/expression, class, or ability. 

  3. Strive for peace and justice among all people, knowing that behaving with compassion and selfless love towards one another is the fullest expression of what we believe. 

  4. Embrace the insights of contemporary science and strive to protect the Earth and ensure its integrity and sustainability. 

  5. Commit to a path of life-long learning, believing there is more value in questioning than in absolutes. 

When we encounter those five points, some readers will see nothing wrong with any of them. Some may object outright to some or all of those tenets. Others may see nothing overtly incorrect but may wonder about the implications and extension of them. The first point seems to intentionally leave room for other paths to salvation besides Jesus Christ, which many believers will find objectionable. Past versions of the ‘core values’ make this explicit. The 2003 version says that progressive Christians “have found an approach to God through the life and teachings of Jesus” but “recognize the faithfulness of other people who have other names for the way to God's realm, and acknowledge that their ways are true for them, as our ways are true for us.” The fourth point of the 2003 version says that progressive Christians “invite all people to participate in our community and worship life without insisting that they become like us in order

to be acceptable (including but not limited to): believers and agnostics, conventional Christians and questioning skeptics, women and men, those of all sexual orientations and gender identities [...]” The 2011 version, which was the most recent until 2022, states that progressive Christians “affirm that the teachings of Jesus provide but one of many ways to experience the Sacredness and Oneness of life [...]” These tenets have evolved in their wording throughout the years. A quick browse of the website’s themed liturgies will show that those principles espoused in earlier versions are very much alive and well in current offerings.

Is Progressive Christianity Scriptural?

Many worldviews or ideologies have positive and negative components, and progressive Christianity certainly contains both. Many of the objections to absolutes come from seeing the flaws that can come when the search for truth through reason and rationality are taken to an extreme. Postmodernists have rightfully concluded that logic and reason do not hold all the answers to life’s hard problems. This recognition is positive and worthy of consideration. Another positive of those who call themselves progressive is that they emphasize that belief should be manifested in action. Unfortunately, almost all beliefs are seen as equally valid under this frame of reference. If there is no absolute truth, how does one know what to believe, and - therefore - how to act? Postmodernism encourages questioning, while at the same time postulating that answers aren’t possible. Questioning is vital. But the point of questioning should be to try to uncover at least some absolutes. There is a big difference in admitting we don’t know it all and believing all is unknowable. God gave us reason and logic to supplement His revealed truth in Jesus. Part of that truth involves discerning right from wrong, based on the principles He has laid out. 

With this rejection of absolutes will usually come a rejection of some of the core values of Christianity. We, as Christadelphians, can respect and relate to the questioning that leads to a different understanding of the scriptures than those of mainstream Christianity. However, the doctrines that are being questioned and discarded by progressive Christianity include doctrines that have solid biblical foundation. Some of these ideas can be found in the works of popular progressive Christian authors. For instance, Marcus Borg writes about how the Bible can be used as a way to experience God, rather than as “correct theology” (Borg, 2015). Dale Allison espouses the view that Jesus was incorrect in his teachings about the end times (Coleman, 2022). Other progressive Christian authors whose names some might recognize include Rob Bell, the late Rachel Held Evans, Glennon Doyle, and Jen Hatmaker. There may be some value in some aspects of their writing; however, there are views such as universal salvation, moral relativism, and acceptance of homosexuality as a lifestyle, among others, that are contradictory with scripture. 

A conversation about progressive Christianity will necessarily include the stances its adherents take on issues such as abortion, homosexuality, transgenderism, and medically assisted suicide. Because postmodernism, and by extension, progressive Christianity, is the worldview gaining popularity most at the moment, many reading this will hold beliefs consistent with that view and will have positions on those topics that have not historically been seen as compatible

with Christianity. I will argue - respectfully - that some of those views still are not. In this series, I will argue for our community - as individuals and ecclesias - to undertake a re-examination of worldviews, an analysis of the history and implications of some of the views espoused by society around us, and a comparison of these views to scripture. I will argue for a return to what I believe is a more consistent biblical worldview - one that neither accepts every path as equally valid nor condemns or acts in an unkind manner to those who disagree. 

It is important to have a coherent worldview, one that allows us to fit new pieces of information into a cohesive understanding of the world. I believe this is only possible when we are looking at the world through a biblical lens; and I will argue that this lens is not only the most accurate, but the most straightforward and consistent way of seeing the world. Before reading the next article, consider taking a few minutes to articulate your own worldview, using Bible verses if possible. Some to consider include Romans 12:2, Romans 8:6, and John 4:24. These verses focus on our outlook on the world, highlighting that our thought processes and behavior are to be focused on God’s truth. This is not a common way to view the world today, and those who do so will undoubtedly be seen as simple or old-fashioned. We live in a time when most have been influenced by the thinking that everything is right except stating that something is wrong. We cannot control others’ perceptions of us, but we can ensure that we are applying a biblical worldview with love, truth, and consistency. The rest of this series will strive to do that.

References 

Barna Group. (n.d.). Competing Worldviews Influence Today’s Christians.
https://www.barna.com/research/competing-worldviews-influence-todays-christians/ 

Borg, M. J. (2015). Reading the Bible Again for the First Time: Taking the Bible Seriously but Not Literally. HarperOne. 

Coleman, A. (2022). Progressive Christian Writers, Bloggers, and Podcasters. The Contemplative Life.
https://www.thecontemplativelife.org/blog/top-10-progressive-liberal-christian-writers-authors-bloggers-podcasters 

Duignan, B. (2022). Postmodernism. Encyclopedia Britannica. 
https://www.britannica.com/topic/postmodernism-philosophy 

Fraser, W. (2018). From Mythos to Logos. In: Seeking Wisdom in Adult Teaching and Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56295-1_6 

Gale Encyclopedia of World History: Governments. Introduction to The Premodern World (1000–1500). Retrieved November 29, 2022 from Encyclopedia.com: 
https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/introductio n-premodern-world-1000-1500

ProgressiveChristianity.org :The Core Values of Progressive Christianity. (n.d.). ProgressiveChristianity.org.
https://progressivechristianity.org/the-8-points/ 

Sire, J. W. (2009). The universe next door (5th ed.). InterVarsity Press. Worldview Comparison Chart.
https://cristinao.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/sire-cristinao.pdf 

Six Primary Worldviews. (2018, March 30). Relational Wisdom VB | Ken Sande.
https://rw360values.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Six-Worldviews.pdf 

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible. (n.d). G4254. In blueletterbible.com. Wikipedia contributors. (2022, November 27). Modern era. Wikipedia. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_era 

"Worldview." Merriam-Webster.com. (November 29, 2022).
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/worldview

Worldview Articles.

  • Worldviews Part Two

    Discussing Challenging Issues.

  • Learning Discernment

    Moral implications of gender, sexuality, and identity.

  • Biblical Worldview Part One

    The Creator’s Purpose.

  • Biblical Worldview Part Two

    God’s Authority.

  • Exploring the Biblical Worldview

    An introduction into the greater topic.

  • Related Content & Resources

    A compilation of researched books, podcasts, videos, and other literature that may be helpful or edifying, regarding this topic.